|
Roundabouts Home |
History of Roundabouts |
FAQ | How
to Use a Roundabout | Roundabout Safety |
Roundabouts on the Maryland State Highway System |
Roundabout Links | Information
& Feedback
Roundabout Safety
Many studies have found that one of the
benefits of roundabout installation is the improvement in
overall safety performance. Several studies in the U.S., Europe,
and Australia have found that roundabouts perform better in
terms of safety than other intersection forms. In particular,
singlelane roundabouts have been found to perform better
than twoway stopcontrolled intersections in the U.S. Although the frequency of reported crashes is not always
lower at roundabouts, reduced injury rates are typical. Safety is typically better at small and medium capacity
roundabouts than at large or multilane roundabouts. While overall crash frequencies have been reduced,
the crash reductions are most pronounced for motor vehicles,
less pronounced for pedestrians, and mixed for bicyclists
depending on the study and bicycle design treatments.
Why do roundabouts have such a good safety
record?
1. Conflicts are reduced. Roundabouts
have fewer conflict points in comparison to conventional intersections.
The potential for hazardous conflicts, such as right angle
and left turn headon crashes is eliminated with roundabout
use. Singlelane approach roundabouts produce greater safety
benefits than multilane approaches because of fewer potential
conflicts between road users, and because pedestrian crossing
distances are short.
2. Speeds are reduced and are
more consistent. Low absolute speeds associated
with roundabouts allow drivers more time to react to potential
conflicts, also helping to improve the safety performance
of roundabouts. Since most road users travel at similar
speeds through roundabouts, i.e., have low relative speeds,
crash severity can be reduced compared to some traditionally
controlled intersections.
3. Pedestrians cross one direction
of traffic at a time. Pedestrians need only cross
one direction of traffic at a time at each approach as they
traverse roundabouts, as compared with twoway and allway
stopcontrolled intersections. The conflict locations between
vehicles and pedestrians are generally not affected by the
presence of a roundabout, although conflicting vehicles come
from a more defined path at roundabouts (and thus pedestrians
have fewer places to check for conflicting vehicles). In addition, the speeds of motorists entering and exiting
a roundabout are reduced with good design. As with other crossings
requiring acceptance of gaps, roundabouts still present visually
impaired pedestrians with unique challenges.
That said, roundabouts are not always safer
than other alternatives:
- For multilane roundabouts, bicycle
safety at roundabouts has been found to be poorer than
at other intersections unless separate bicycle or multiuse
paths are provided around the outside of the roundabout.
-
Pedestrians, especially visually impaired
or blind pedestrians, can have difficulty when trying
to judge gaps in traffic across entries or exits with
more than one lane.
Excerpted from:
Federal Highway Administration, Roundabouts: An Informational
Guide, Report No. FHWARD00067, June 2000.
All content contained within these materials is
the intellectual property of Maryland State Highway Administration.
|